navigation

Urban Commons: Lessons from Barcelona at the beginning of 21st century

A characterization proposal

PhD. Theses: Carlos Cámara Menoyo
Supervisors: Dr. Josep Vivas i Elias, Dr. Ramon Ribera-Fumaz
Supervising comitee: Dr. Jorge León Casero
PhD. Programme: Information and Knowledge Society (Universitat Oberta de Catalunya)
Date: January 2018

Abstract

The concept of the commons is as strongly suggestive as ambiguous. This is evidenced by the growing interest in recent years which encompasses areas and aspirations so diverse that despite being contradictory sometimes, share a transformative vision based on cooperation. The present doctoral research focuses on one of the subgroups of such commons, that of urban commons, aiming to problematize and understand them.

In order to achieve this, and after an exhaustive theoretical framework that will lead us to the roots and contradictions of the concept, we propose a situated approach based on the praxis. Based on an ethnographic study of 29 cases (8 of them analysed in depth) within the Barcelona of the beginning of the 21st century, we made 5 discursive threads about their demands, self-management and institutionalization, relationality, materiality and spatiality and technology and free culture. It is from their analysis that we obtain the keys to understand their links with the urban and the social and, ultimately, to characterize the concept of urban common in order to resolve if they can effectively be drivers of urban, social and economic transformation that lead to propose alternative and fairer cities and societies.

Keywords: commons, urban commons, cities, crisis, right to the city, ethnograpy, study cases, informationalism.

Only two chapters of this PhD theses (which conform 23 of the theoretical framework) are currently in English: 2. The commons: state of the art) and 3. Framing the commons. If you are interested in some other chapter in Spanish, please let me know so I might start translating it.

This website is an online version of my PhD, aimed to be read on screen. After some time it is very likely that this online version may differ slightly from the one submitted for the defence, which can be downloaded in PDF from the institutional repository